A European telecom law agreed by a working group now is intended to prevent Internet service providers from blocking or else slowing down jungle applications, but lets ISPs charge content providers used for privileged quality of service.
Critics say this allowance strength of character create an Internet "fast lane" and weaken the doctrine of web neutrality, with the aim of Internet service providers ought to take care of all traffic equally. The European Parliament's Industry working group announced its take part in an election featuring in support of the "Connected Continent" legislation, adage with the aim of "Internet providers ought to rebuff longer ensue able to stop or else reduce speed down Internet services provided by their competitors."
Under the headline, "Net neutrality," the working group proclamation assumed it "inserted strict rules to prevent telecoms companies from degrading or else blocking Internet associations to their competitors’ services and applications. Featuring in 2012, used for exemplar, EU telecoms control device BEREC reported with the aim of several internet providers were blocking or else slowing down services like 'Skype.'"
The European Telecommunications interact Operators' memory (ETNO), a telco lobby set, criticizes the restrictions the same as too harsh, adage, "This would progress to an in effect management of the interact almost unworkable."
On the other segment of the aisle, consumer advocates are troubled approximately an exception featuring in the legislation used for "specialized services."
"Companies would still able to offer specialized services of privileged quality, such the same as capture on tape on demand and business-critical data-intensive cloud applications, provided with the aim of this does not interfere with the Internet speeds promised to other customers," the working group proclamation assumed. "Measures to stop or else reduce speed down the Internet would ensue tolerable just featuring in exceptional suitcases, e.G., someplace specifically well thought-out by a date."
Charging content providers "will enable telecom operators to generate other revenue streams from OTT [over the top] actors, content providers the same as well the same as from consumers who are willing to forfeit used for better or else earlier services," a cost class states. "These revenues featuring in try, strength of character enable operators to finance funds into interact upgrades and spreading out."
Particular European parliament members objected. Marietje Schaake of the Netherlands assumed the remuneration of a stronger government boast been demonstrated featuring in her land of your birth territory, which agreed a web neutrality law featuring in 2012. "For Dutch companies a level playing-field is of great magnitude; being the frontrunner has its disadvantages the same as prolonged the same as not all European companies boast to abide by the same rules. Exclusive of officially authorized guarantees used for web neutrality, Internet service providers were able to stifle competitors. This may well goad players exclusive of deep pockets, such the same as start-ups, hospitals or else universities, dazed of the marketplace. Today’s take part in an election risks allowing simply with the aim of," she assumed.
The web neutrality control was anticipated by an alternative Dutch politician, Neelie Kroes, the European representative used for Digital Agenda. Kroes touted her proposal's "new safeguards to ensure access to the direct Internet. Now, millions of Europeans get hold of services like Skype blocked, or else their Internet access degraded: My proposal strength of character put a stop to folks discriminatory practices. Optional extra recent 'specialized services' (like used for IPTV, e-Health, or else cloud computing) would ensue tolerable just if they don't cause broad-spectrum impairment of regular Internet access."
The sated parliament is scheduled to take part in an election on the proposal April 3.
Consumer-friendly bar on nomadic charges
Featuring in addition to web neutrality, the legislation would bar nearly everyone cellular phone nomadic charges. "A broad majority of the working group members backed diplomacy to bar 'roaming' charges inside the EU the same as of 15 December 2015," the working group proclamation assumed. "However, to keep telecoms companies versus 'anomalous or else abusive management of retail nomadic services,' MEPs [Members of the European Parliament] ask the European Commission to lay down guidelines used for exceptional suitcases featuring in which companies would ensue tolerable to apply charges. These charges would, however, boast to ensue under the caps laid down featuring in current nomadic rules."
Schaake assumed the popularity of the nomadic charge restriction helped step the legislation agreed, despite its warts. "The in one piece package has been rushed through by Parliament for the reason that abolishing nomadic overheads is a polite message to campaign on," she assumed.
Non-government organizations with the aim of oppose the legislation unbending up a website upper-class, Save the Internet. "Right at this point immense companies like Microsoft and Facebook are on the same level the same as our Blogs or else Podcasts," the place says. "But if the definition of 'specialized services' isn't fixed, these companies strength of character ensue featuring in the fast fast lane on the data highway, leaving start-ups and non-commercial websites like Wikipedia featuring in the reduce speed fast lane."
Save the Internet claimed with the aim of the control strength of character consent to ISPs "block content exclusive of several court mistake." The committee's proclamation disputes with the aim of, but a Save The Internet representative argued with the aim of "Although the proposal explicitly prohibits blocking and throttling, it authorizes recent forms of discrimination with the aim of would boast the same effect, by allowing exclusive and restrictive marketable deals involving Internet access providers and service bringer."
The set additionally believes the rules are imprecisely in black and white and may well ensue interpreted featuring in injurious ways, and pointed to legislation text with the aim of says:
Inside the limits of several contractually agreed data volumes or else speeds used for internet access services, and topic to the broad-spectrum quality characteristics of the service, providers of internet access services shall not constrain the freedoms provided used for featuring in snippet 1 by blocking, slowing down, shifting or else degrading feature content, applications or else services, or else feature classes thereof, bar featuring in suitcases someplace it is obligatory to apply (deletion) traffic management measures. Traffic management measures shall not ensue practical featuring in such a way the same as to discriminate versus services competing with folks accessible by the bringer of Internet access. Traffic management measures shall ensue transparent, non-discriminatory, balanced and obligatory featuring in precise to:
A) put into practice a date order;
B) preserve the integrity and security of the interact, services provided via this interact, and the end-users' terminals;
C) prevent the transmission of unsolicited marketable communications to end-users;
D) prevent interact congestion or else soften the things of temporary or else exceptional interact congestion provided with the aim of equivalent types of traffic are treated equally.
European Digital constitutional rights Executive Director Joe McNamee, a Save The Internet affiliate, told Ars with the aim of the line preventing discrimination "against services competing with folks accessible by the bringer of Internet access" may well mean with the aim of "traffic management can ensue practical versus other services." He additionally pointed to the "contractually agreed data volumes or else speeds" section, adage, "if near is a low contractually agreed data volume and discrimination is just explicitly forbidden inside several contractually agreed limits, therefore surely this wealth with the aim of outside a low or else non-existing limit, the discrimination is tolerable. Or else does it? Is this the most awful drafting increasingly?"
Featuring in a blog advertise reacting to today's take part in an election, Save The Internet additionally criticized the legislation's "broad definition of “specialized services” with the aim of does not provide take home officially authorized guidance to regulators and companies. 'Specialized services' ought to ensue restricted to services provided by ISPs, such the same as IPTV, and ought to not ensue baffled with services on the direct internet, like YouTube or else Spotify."
Featuring in the US, the Federal Communications Commission issued web neutrality rules featuring in 2010 with the aim of prevented fixed broadband providers (though not cellular carriers) from blocking and degrading traffic or else charging used for special access. The rules were overturned by a date decision this time.
没有评论:
发表评论